One of the questions my profressor, Dr. Kendrick, asked during our Jane Austen class began like this..."The 18th century saw
a controversy regarding the reading of novels, especially by women (and
it's interesting that the number of female novelists increased exponentially
during this time as well). Novels were considered by many to be "low"
forms of entertainment that enticed women to abandon virtue. However,
Zlotnick believes that this novel ". . . offer[s] an alternative vision,
in which wise and judicious female reading emerges as a possible antidote to
female victimization"."
Here are some of my thoughts on Austen's take of the reading habits of women:
The
reading habits of Catherine, Isabella, and Eleanor support Zlotnick’s support
of the idea that wise female reading may be an antidote to female
victimization. In the case of Catherine
Moreland her reading of Gothic novels allows her to read of heroines that have
more spirit than the men in the novels, how to navigate in her
social world, how to act for herself, and to
become an amateur detective in the Tilney household. She has for the most part avoided reading
history (written in this time by male quthors with a view toward repressing females) and so her thinking has been guided more by thoughts of successful
feminism than depressing male suppression.
She becomes a voluntary spy through imaginative thinking and her ability
to think for herself and to take action on those thoughts (as when she opens the chest
in her bedroom). She believes she has the
right to make her own choices, which intrigues Henry.
Isabella’s
reading also focuses on novels. In her
case, she learns to parrot back the words of what she believes eligible
bachelors want a marriageable girl to be (the heroine), even though those words
are for the most part the opposite of her true characteristics. She believes that wealth is her ticket to
freedom, at least to freedom of choice. Like the world of commerce around her she
tries to trade one man, James Thorpe, for another, Frederick Tilney, because he
has greater wealth. However, she does
not realize that the men around her do not value or appreciate a woman who
applies market values to them.
She believes that she not only has the right to make choices but that
she has the right to trade her choices. She
is not successful in the marriage market and loses both men and her chances for
marriage for the time being.
Eleanor
mainly reads history books by male authors and her thoughts are thus shaped by
a sense of women’s lack of value. She
feels immobilized by her reading. She is less proactive than Catherine or
Isabella and is content to let the men in her world – at this time her father
and her brother – make choices for her. Although she is well-educated she does not have the spirit to act on her education or to imagine a future different than what
women before her have held.
This is where we see a great
difference between the novel-reading of Catherine (often written by females)
and the historical-reading (mostly written by males) of Eleanor. She does not believe she can make her own
choices. Eleanor is successful in the marriage market
only because her suitor becomes socially and financially acceptable, not
because she has played a role in making any choices.
No comments:
Post a Comment